This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sf/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund If you appreciate our service to voters, please consider helping us with a donation.
Smart Voter
San Francisco County, CA November 4, 2014 Election
Proposition I
Renovation of Playgrounds, Walking Trails, and Athletic Fields
City of San Francisco

Majority Approval Required

Pass: 120,884 / 55.21% Yes votes ...... 98,057 / 44.79% No votes

See Also: Index of all Propositions

Information shown below: Summary | Fiscal Impact | Yes/No Meaning | Arguments |

Shall the City allow renovations to children's playgrounds, walking trails and athletic fields if such renovations, which could include installing artificial turf or nighttime lighting on athletic fields, would double their anticipated usage and if an environmental impact report has been certified?

Summary:
The Way It Is Now: The City's Recreation and Park Department operates and maintains many of the pub- lic parks, walking trails and athletic fields in the City.

The Proposal: Proposition I would amend the Park Code so that the City shall allow renovations to any children's playground, walking trail or athletic field if the renovation satisfies the following conditions:

  • the Recreation and Park Department has deter- mined that the renovation would double the public's use; and
  • an environmental impact report has been certified if required by law.

This ordinance would apply to children's playgrounds, walking trails and athletic fields that have already satisfied these conditions. Renovations could include installing artificial turf or nighttime lighting on athletic fields.

The Board of Supervisors could by a two-thirds' vote amend this ordinance without voter approval.

Fiscal Impact:
City Controller Ben Rosenfield has issued the following statement on the fiscal impact of Proposition I:

Should the proposed ordinance be approved by the voters, in my opinion, it would not, in and of itself affect, the cost of government.

The proposed ordinance provides that renovations to playgrounds, trails and fields can proceed if increased usage to the relevant facilities is projected and a certified Environmental Impact Report is in place.The City pays for renovations to playgrounds, trails and fields through its park bond programs and other funding sources which are approved through the budgetary and fiscal provisions of the Charter.These processes would not be substantially affected by the ordinance.

Meaning of Voting Yes/No
A YES vote on this measure means:
If you vote "yes," you want to amend the Park Code so that the City shall allow renovations to children's playgrounds, walking trails and athletic fields if such renovation would double their anticipated usage and if an environmental impact report has been certified.These renovations could include installing artificial turf or nighttime lighting on athletic fields.

A NO vote on this measure means:
If you vote "no," you do not want to make these changes to the Park Code.

 
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Proposition I Arguments Against Proposition I
Yes on I + Expand Recreation in City Parks

Proposition I will get more people into San Francisco parks to play, walk and exercise. Please join me in votingYes on I.

During the past 15 years, San Francisco has recreated our park system. As a City, we have invested in new playgrounds and recreation centers. We have rebuilt playgrounds, created skate parks, added dog play areas, repaired recreation centers, renovated sports fields and reopened park bathrooms.These efforts have been tremendously successful and, today, more than 400,000 people visit our parks each week + more than any time in our city's history.

Still, some of San Francisco's most popular park facilities remain out-of-date, unsafe and under used. Our older playgrounds sit empty and idle while our new playgrounds are bustling with children. We don't have enough sports fields for everyone who wants to play and children are turned away. Many of our walking trails remain hidden beneath overgrowth and inaccessible to the public.

We can do better. Proposition I is a simple solution to restore, improve and expand play in our parks.

Proposition I ensures that playground, athletic field and walking trail renovations will proceed if an environmental impact report documents that the project will double the public's use of that facility.This mea- sure will get more San Franciscans into our park to recreate, relax and unwind.

Prop I will not cost the city a dime and does not limit one's ability to question, appeal or offer improvements to proposed projects.The measure just prevents new laws from being passed that would stop the renovation of certain playgrounds, athletic fields and walking trails after they have been approved.

Proposition I is smart planning for our city's health and future.

VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION I

At first glance, "I" appears to be nothing more than a thinly disguised "poison pill" designed to confuse voters and defeat Proposition "H."

BUT WHAT DOES "I" REALLY DO?

"I" states that it "authorizes renovation" of parks. But the San Francisco Charter already grants broad powers to the Recreation and Park Commission to approve projects.These extensive powers are subject to a limited set of checks and balances, one of which is the ballot initiative process.

However, "I" implements a procedural trigger -- if the Recreation and Park Department forecasts that a project would double the usage of fields, trails, or play- grounds, and if that estimate is cited in a Certified EIR, then the "... the City shall allow ..." the renovations. In a legal context, the word "shall" generally means a compulsion to perform an act.


San Francisco Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: July 23, 2015 14:58 PDT
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://cavotes.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.