This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/alm/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund If you appreciate our service to voters, please consider helping us with a donation.
Smart Voter
Alameda County, CA November 4, 2014 Election
Measure CC
Increase the Public Ethics Commission's Independence, Enforcement Authority, and Responsibilities
City of Oakland

Charter Amendment - Majority Approval Required

Pass: 65738 / 73.92% Yes votes ...... 23190 / 26.08% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Results as of Dec 28 11:38am, 100.00% of Precincts Reporting (275/275)
Information shown below: Summary | Fiscal Impact | Impartial Analysis | Arguments | Full Text

Shall the Charter of the City of Oakland be amended to provide the Public Ethics Commission greater independence, broader enforcement authority, powers and responsibilities, and minimum budget for staff to enforce compliance with ethics-related laws and requirements?

Summary Prepared by City Attorney:
This measure would amend provisions in the Oakland City Charter that govern the Public Ethics Commission ("Commission"). The Commission's current purview is limited to City regulations and policies such as the City's Sunshine Ordinance, conflict of interest code, code of ethics, campaign finance reform ordinance, and the Public Records Act. The Charter also mandates that the Commission annually raise Council salaries by the increase in the consumer price index; the Commission has the option to increase salaries beyond the increase in the consumer price index up to a total of five percent.

The measure would change the appointment process and qualifications for Commissioners, grant the Commission additional enforcement powers and mandate minimum staffing; it would not change the Commission's obligations with respect to annually increasing Councilmembers' salaries.

Term, Appointment and Qualifications of Commissioners

This Charter amendment gives the Mayor, City Attorney and City Auditor each the right to appoint one Commissioner, subject to the Council's right to reject, any such appointment within 45 days of receiving notice thereof The Commission continues to have the power, by the affirmative vote of at least four members, to appoint the four Commissioners who are not appointed by the Mayor, City Attorney or City Auditor.

The measure specifies qualifications to serve on the Commission, including different qualifications for each of the Commissioners appointed by the Mayor, City Attorney and City Auditor. This measure retains the requirement that all Commissioners be Oakland residents and be registered to vote in Oakland elections. (Please see City Attorney's Impartial Legal Analysis for more details.)

Enforcement Powers

The proposed Charter amendment would give the Commission power to enforce the following additional laws: (1) City Charter's prohibitions against Council interference in administrative affairs, nepotism, conflict of interest, and conflict in office, (2) Oakland Lobbyist Registration Act, Limited Public Financing Act and False Endorsement in Campaign Literature Act, lobbying, transparency, and other ethics-related local ordinances, and (3) related state laws including the Political Reform Act, Ralph M. Brown Act (the state's open meetings law) and the Public Records Act as they pertain to Oakland.

This measure would empower the Commission (1) by the affirmative vote of at least four Commissioners to dismiss cases and to impose penalties, remedies and fines as provided by ordinance, (2) by the affirmative vote of five members to reprimand, censure or impose administrative remedies as provided by ordinance after investigation and an open and public meeting, and (3) to seek remedial and injunctive relief for violations.

Penalties, remedies and fines are appealable to the Alameda County Superior Court. The Commission is required to develop guidelines for exercising its enforcement powers and imposing penalties.

Funding of Minimum Staffing

The proposed Charter amendment requires the City to fund sufficient staff to fulfill the Commission's functions and duties. Sufficient staffing shall be not less than six full time positions as identified in the measure.

Barbara J. Parker

City Attorney

Fiscal Impact from City Auditor:
City Auditor's Impartial Financial Analysis of Measure Cc

Measure CC is a Charter Amendment to provide the Oakland Public Ethics Commission (PEC) with greater independence, enforcement authority, responsibilities and to establish a minimum staffing level.

The PEC was formed in 1996 with the goal of ensuring "fairness, openness, honesty, and integrity" in City government. However, it has been noted that the PEC currently has insufficient resources and authority to adequately fulfill its mission of administering and enforcing campaign finance, lobbying, transparency, and governmental ethics laws.

Financial Impact

There are two main costs to the City of Oakland (City) that will result from Measure CC passing: 1) staffing costs, and 2) operations & maintenance (O&M) costs.

Measure CC increases the current PEC staffing level from 2 Full Time Employees (FTEs) to a minimum staffing level of 6 FTEs, effective July 1, 2015. However, the Measure also includes a provision that allows the minimum staffing level to be suspended for one to two years if the City Council declares, by resolution, an extreme fiscal necessity.

Passing this Measure will cost the City an additional $487,697 to $519,866 annually, as detailed below.

Cost ComponentCurrent FY 2014-15 Budget (2 FTEs)Additional Measure CC Costs per FY (+4 FTEs)ATotal Annual Cost (6 FTEs)
Staffing$302,666$451,697 to $483,866$754,363 to $786,532
O&M$60,300$36,000B$96,300
Total$362,966$487,697 to $519,866$850,663 to $882,832

A Staffing cost based on FY 2014-15 staff salaries and benefit rates
B The original estimated O&M costs were adjusted by the Auditor to reflect the approved addition of four FTEs

Additionally, there are two potential, financial impacts that cannot be quantified at this time, but are noted below:

  • Staff salaries and benefit rates may increase over time which would increase the cost to the City
  • Fines levied by the PEC for ethics-related violations may generate some revenue for the City

Based on our analysis of the data provided by City staff, the estimated costs appear accurate. This analysis relied on the best data available at the time; however, actual results may vary from these estimates.

s/COURTNEY A. RUBY, CPA, CFE City Auditor

Impartial Analysis from City Attorney
The Public Ethics Commission ("Commission") was established in 1996 to respond to issues regarding compliance of the City, its elected officials, officers and employees, boards and commissions with City regulations and policies intended to assure fairness, openness, honesty, and integrity in City government.

The current Charter provides that the Commission shall respond to issues regarding compliance with local laws pertaining to elections, campaigns, ethics, public records and open meetings, and annually increase Councilmembers' salaries. The current Charter also provides that the Council by ordinance shall prescribe the Commission's functions, duties, powers and jurisdiction. Existing law does not set minimum staffing or budget requirements for the Commission.

Term, Appointment and Qualifications of Commissioners

Currently, the Charter gives the Mayor the power to nominate three Commissioners, subject to City Council confirmation. This measure changes the appointment process, giving one appointment each to the Mayor, City Attorney and City Auditor. The Commission currently appoints and would continue to appoint the remaining four Commissioners.

Currently, a Commissioner can serve a maximum of one full three-year term. This measure allows Commissioners to serve no more than two consecutive full three-year terms. The measure imposes restrictions on Commissioners, including but not limited to (1) prohibiting contractual or employment relationships with the City or being an Oakland lobbyist during the Commissioner's tenure and for one year thereafter; (2) seeking election to public office in a jurisdiction intersecting with Oakland; (3) participating in or contributing to an Oakland municipal campaign; and (4) endorsing, supporting, opposing or working on behalf of any candidate or measure in an Oakland election.

The measure empowers the Commission to terminate its Executive Director. This changes the Executive Director from a civil service classification with termination only for just cause to "at will."

Enforcement Authority

This measure expands the Commission's oversight and enforcement authority to include censure, reprimand, and administrative remedies for ethics, campaign and Charter-related violations. The measure provides express authority to seek injunctions and to impose fines or penalties that exceed $1,000. The measure makes the Commission responsible for education about, and administration and enforcement of, state and local ethics related laws including City Charter provisions prohibiting Councilmember interference with administrative affairs, nepotism, conflicts in office, conflicts of interest, campaign finance, lobbying and transparency.

Funding for Minimum Staffing

The current Charter does not mandate that the City fund any staff to support the Commission in performing its functions and duties. The City Council has discretion to determine the staffing budget for City offices, departments, boards and commissions. This measure amends the Charter to require that the City fund a minimum of six, full-time positions: Executive Director, Deputy Director, Ethics Investigator, Program Analyst or Operations Support Specialist, Program Analyst and Administrative Assistant. The measure converts two positions into selective certification positions, allowing seniority-based layoffs only with respect to employees who possess the selective certification qualifications.

The City Council placed this measure on the ballot. Passage of this measure requires an affirmative vote by the majority of voters who cast ballots

  Nonpartisan Information

League of Women Voters

News and Analysis

East Bay Express

Partisan Information

Voices of those in favor of and against this measure

This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure CC Arguments Against Measure CC
For the first time since the Oakland Public Ethics Commission was created in 1996, we have a chance to strengthen our watchdog over Oakland government. Following months of public outreach and best practices research, and consultation with government reform experts, it is now up to you to create an Ethics Commission with teeth.

The Alameda County Grand Jury found last year that the Ethics Commission lacks sufficient resources and authority to fulfill its mission of holding government officials accountable. By contrast, Ethics Commissions in other cities are better staffed and more independent, and have greater enforcement powers.

During the past 18 years, our City Councils have provided the Commission with almost no staff.

This reform measure strengthens our Ethics Commission by:

  • Making it more independent from City Hall;
  • Giving it stronger enforcement authority to hold public officials and lobbyists accountable;
  • Giving it greater responsibilities and oversight over government ethics laws;
  • Providing it with enough staff to do the job we expect it to do.

These overdue improvements will significantly enhance education and enforcement of our campaign finance, lobbyist regulation, government transparency and whistleblower protection laws. When properly funded, these programs can save government money that would be lost through corruption, cronyism, and secrecy.

Please join Common Cause, Greenlining Institute, Make Oakland Better Now, Oakland Rising, Asian Pacific Environmental Network, West Oakland Commerce Association, and many other groups supporting Measure CC.

Enough is enough! It's time to give our Ethics Commission the independence and authority it needs to be the effective government watchdog we must have. Vote YES on measure CC.

s/ Katherine Gavzy League of Women Voters of Oakland

s/ Fumi Sugihara Former Public Ethics Commission Chairperson

s/ Victor Ochoa Former Public Ethics Commission Chairperson; Past Board President, Centro Legal de la Raza

s/ Hon. William Patterson Board Member, East Bay MUD

s/ Dan Kalb City Councilmember

No arguments against Measure CC were submitted.

Full Text of Measure CC
Section 202 - Public Ethics Commission; Council Salaries

(a) There is hereby established a Public Ethics Commission which shall be responsible for responding to issues with regard to compliance by the City of Oakland, its elected officials, officers, employees, boards and commissions with regard to compliance with City regulations and policies intended to assure fairness, openness, honesty and integrity in City government including, Oakland's Campaign Finance Reform Ordinance, conflict of interest code, code of ethics and any ordinance intended to supplement the Brown Act, and to make recommendations to the City Council on matters relating thereto, and it shall set City Councilmember compensation, as set forth herein.

(b) The members of the Public Ethics Commission shall consist of seven (7) members who shall be Oakland residents.

(1) Initial appointments. The first seven members of the Commission shall be appointed as follows: Three (3) members who represent local civic organizations with a demonstrated history of involvement in local governance issues shall be nominated for appointment by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council; and four (4) members shall be appointed following a public recruitment and application following a public recruitment and application process, by the unanimous vote of the three (3) representatives appointed by the City Council. The four (4) members so appointed shall reflect the interest of the greater Oakland neighborhood and business communities.

(2) Subsequent Mayoral appointments. A vacancy in any of the three (3) positions nominated for appointment by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council shall be filled in the same manner and upon consideration of the same criteria as for the initial Mayoral appointments.

(3) Subsequent Non-Mayoral appointments. A vacancy in any of the four (4) positions initially selected by the unanimous vote of the three (3) Mayoral appointments shall be filled, following a public recruitment and application process, by a candidate who receives the affirmative vote of at least four (4) members of the Commission. Any member so appointed shall reflect the interests of the greater Oakland neighborhood and business communities.

(4) Staggered Terms. Both categories of member shall be appointed to staggered terms.

(5) Functions, duties, powers, jurisdiction and terms. The City shall by ordinance prescribe the function, duties, powers, jurisdiction and the terms of members of the Commission, in accordance with this Article.

(C) Beginning with Fiscal Year 2003-2004, tThe Public Ethics Commission shall biannually adjust the salary for the office of Councilmember by the increase in the consumer price index over the preceding two years. The Commission may adjust salaries beyond the increase in the consumer price index up to a total of five percent. Any portion of an increase in compensation for the office of Councilmember that would result in an overall increase for that year in excess of five percent must be approved by the voters.

Section 603 - Public Ethics Commission

(a) Creation and Role. There is hereby established a Public Ethics Commission which shall be responsible for: (1) enforcement of laws, regulations and policies intended to assure fairness, openness, honesty and integrity in City government, including compliance by the City of Oakland, its elected officials, officers, employees, boards and commissions, and other persons subject to laws within the jurisdiction of the Commission; (2) education and responding to issues regarding the aforementioned laws, regulations and policies, and; (3) impartial and effective administration and implementation of programs to accomplish the goals and purposes of the Commission as defined by this Section. Such laws, regulations, policies, and programs shall include those relating to campaign finance, lobbying, transparency, and governmental ethics, as they pertain to Oakland. The Commission shall have the power to make recommendations to the City Council on matters relating to the foregoing. Nothing in this Section shall preclude other City officials, agencies, boards and commissions from exercising authority heretofore or hereafter granted to them, with the exception of Charter Section 603(b)(5).

(b) Functions and Duties. It shall be the function and duty of the Public Ethics Commission to:

(1) Foster and enforce compliance with:

(i) Sections 218 ("Non-interference in Administrative Affairs"), 907 ("Nepotism"), 1200 ("Conflict of Interest") and 1202 ("Conflict in Office") of this Charter, for violations occurring on or after January 1, 2015;

(ii) The Oakland Campaign Reform Act, Limited Public Financing Act and False Endorsement in Campaign Literature Act, Oakland's Conflict of Interest Code, code of ethics and governmental ethics ordinance, the Oakland Lobbyist Registration Act, the Oakland Sunshine Ordinance, any ordinance intended to protect City whistleblowers from retaliation, and other Oakland laws regarding campaign finance, lobbying, transparency, or governmental ethics, as provided by ordinance or this Charter;

(iii) Related state laws including, but not limited to, the Political Reform Act, Ralph M. Brown Act, and Public Records Act, as they pertain to Oakland.

(2) Report to the City Council concerning the effectiveness of all local laws regarding campaign finance, lobbying, transparency, and governmental ethics.

(3) Issue oral advice and formal written opinions, in consultation with the City Attorney.

(4) Within the time period for submission of such information for the timely completion of the City's regular budget process, provide the Mayor and City Council with an assessment of the Commission's staffing and budgetary needs.

(5) Act as the filing officer and otherwise receive and retain documents whenever the City Clerk would otherwise be authorized to do so pursuant to Chapter 4 of the California Political Reform Act of 1974 (Government Code Section 81000, et seq.), provided that this duty shall be transferred to the Commission during the 24 months following the effective date of this provision and the Commission shall be the sole filing officer for the campaign finance programs by January 1, 2017.

(6) Educate and promote understanding regarding the requirements under the Commission's oversight and study any significant non-compliance problems or trends with Oakland's campaign finance, lobbying, transparency, and governmental ethics laws and identify possible solutions for increasing compliance.

(7) Review and make recommendations regarding all City systems used for public disclosure of information required by any law within the authority of the Commission.

(8) Perform such other functions and duties as may be prescribed by laws of this Charter or City ordinance.

(c) Councilmember Salary Increases. The Public Ethics Commission shall set Council compensation as provided for in Charter Section 202.

(d) Appointment, Vacancies, Terms. The Public Ethics Commission shall consist of seven (7) members who shall be Oakland residents. Commissioners shall serve without compensation.

The Commission shall be appointed as follows in subsection (1) and (2).

(1) Appointments by Mayor, City Attorney and City Auditor. The Mayor shall appoint one member who has represented a local civic organization with a demonstrated history of involvement in local governance issues.

The City Attorney shall appoint one member who has a background in public policy or public law, preferably with experience in governmental ethics or open government matters.

The City Auditor shall appoint one member who has a background in campaign finance, auditing of compliance with ethics laws, protection of whistleblowers, or technology as it relates to open government.

Prior to appointment, all appointees must attest in their application for appointment to attendance of at least one Public Ethics Commission meeting. The Mayor, City Attorney, and City Auditor may not appoint an individual who was paid during the past two years for work by a committee controlled by the official.

Upon the effective date of this section, the three members appointed by the Mayor prior to 2015 shall continue to serve the remainder of their terms. Vacancies in the three positions appointed by the Mayor shall be filled in the following manner: the City Attorney shall appoint a member to fill the first vacancy; the City Auditor shall appoint a member to fill the second vacancy and the Mayor shall appoint the member to fill the third vacancy. Thereafter, the positions appointed by the Mayor, City Attorney and City Auditor shall be filled in the same manner and upon consideration of the same criteria as the initial appointments.

The appointments made by the Mayor, City Attorney, and City Auditor may be rejected by City Council Resolution within 45 days of receiving formal notice of the appointment. An appointment shall become effective once written notice is made by the appointing authority to the City Clerk. Upon receiving such written notice, the Clerk shall promptly provide formal notice to the City Council.

(2) Commission Appointments. The four members of the Commission who are not appointed by the Mayor, City Attorney or City Auditor shall be appointed, following a public recruitment and application process, by the affirmative vote of at least four (4) members of the Commission. Any member so appointed shall reflect the interests of the greater Oakland neighborhood, nonprofit and business communities.

Prior to appointment, all appointees must attest in their application for appointment to attendance of at least one Public Ethics Commission meeting.

(3) Terms of office. All categories of member shall be appointed to staggered terms. Members of the Commission shall be appointed to overlapping terms, to commence upon date of appointment, except that an appointment to fill a vacancy shall be for the unexpired term only. Members of the Commission shall serve for a term of three years. No member may serve more than two consecutive full three-year terms. If a member is appointed to fill an unexpired term which term is for more than 1.5 years, he/she may serve only one additional consecutive three-year term. If a member is appointed to fill an unexpired term which term is for less than 1.5 years, he/she may serve two consecutive full three-year terms.

(4) Quorum. Four members shall constitute a quorum.

(5) Vacancy. A vacancy on the Commission will exist whenever a member dies, resigns, ceases to be a resident of the City or absents himself/herself continuously from the City for a period of more than 30 days without permission from the Commission, is convicted of a felony, is judicially determined to be an incompetent, is permanently so disabled as to be unable to perform the duties of a member, or is removed. A finding of disability shall require the affirmative vote of at least four members of the Commission after considering competent medical evidence bearing on the physical or mental capability of the member.

Vacancies not filled by the Mayor, City Attorney, or City Auditor within 90 days of the occurrence of such vacancy may be filled by the City Council in the same manner as provided by Charter, Section 601.

(6) Removal. Members of the Commission may be removed by their appointing authority, with the concurrence of the Council by Resolution, only for conviction of a felony, substantial neglect of duty, gross misconduct in office, inability to discharge the powers and duties of office, absence from three consecutive regular meetings except on account of illness or when absent by permission of the Commission, or violation of this Charter section, after written notice of the grounds on which removal is sought and an opportunity for a written response.

(e) Qualifications and Restrictions. Each member of the Commission shall be a resident of Oakland and registered to vote in Oakland elections. No member of the Commission shall:

(1) Have an employment or contractual relationship with the City during the member's tenure and for a period of one year after the date of separation.

(2) Be a registered Oakland lobbyist or be required to register as an Oakland lobbyist, or be employed by or receive gifts or other compensation from a registered Oakland lobbyist during the member's tenure and for a period of one year after the date of separation .

(3) Seek election to any other public office in a jurisdiction that intersects with the geographic boundaries of Oakland, or participate in or contribute to an Oakland municipal campaign.

(4) Endorse, support, oppose, or work on behalf of any candidate or measure in an Oakland election.

(f) Enforcement.

(1) Authority. In furtherance of Charter Section 603(b)(1) and (5), the Public Ethics Commission is authorized to:

(i) Conduct investigations;

(ii) Conduct audits of compliance with disclosure requirements with the Commission;

(iii) Conduct public hearings as provided by the Commission's complaint procedures or other law;

(iv) Issue subpoenas to compel the production of books, papers, records and documents and take testimony on any matter pending before the Commission. The Commission may seek a contempt order as provided by the general law of the state for a person's failure or refusal to appear, testify, or to produce required books, papers, records and documents;

(v) Impose penalties, remedies and fines, as provided for by ordinance. Ordinances enforced by the Public Ethics Commission shall not be subject to the $1,000 limit on fines provided Sections 217 and 1208 of this Charter. The Commission's decision to impose penalties and fines for violation of any regulation or ordinance over which the Commission has authority shall be appealable to the Alameda County Superior Court by filing a petition for writ of mandamus;

(vi) Submit referrals to other enforcement authorities, including but not limited to the Alameda County District Attorney, California Fair Political Practices Commission, and California Attorney General;

(vii) Seek remedial relief for violations and injunctive relief;

(viii) By an affirmative vote of at least five members, reprimand, censure, or impose administrative remedies, as provided by a governmental ethics ordinance adopted by the City Council, for violations of Section 218 and 1202 of this Charter, according to the Commission's due process procedures as provided in the Commission's complaint procedures;

(ix) Reprimand, censure, or impose administrative remedies, as provided by a governmental ethics ordinance adopted by the City Council, for violations of Section 907 of this Charter, according to the Commission's due process procedures as provided in the Commission's complaint procedures;

(x) Perform other functions as authorized by law.

(2) Final enforcement action. Final enforcement action by the Commission on a matter, including but not limited to the imposition of fines or dismissal of a case, shall be made by an affirmative vote of at least four members.

(3) Investigations. Preliminary review by Commission staff of allegations shall be confidential, to the extent permitted by law, until any of the following occurs:

(i) Placement of the item on a Public Ethics Commission meeting agenda;

(ii) Passage of one year since the complaint was filed;

(iii) Action by the Executive Director closing the file without placing it on the agenda, pursuant to the Commission's complaint procedures or policies; or

(iv) Expiration of the Statute of Limitations.

(4) Penalty guidelines and Enforcement Discretion. The Public Ethics Commission shall develop a policy setting forth standards for imposing penalties and exercising enforcement discretion. Commission staff shall adhere to the policy when recommending penalties under each of the different penalty provisions that the Commission has the power to enforce.

(5) Per diem late filing fees. Regarding per diem fees that are authorized due to the late filing of disclosure reports, including campaign finance statements, lobbyist reports, and other ethics-related disclosures filed with the Commission by law, the following shall apply:

(i) Assessments. Any instance of late filing that triggers the assessment of a fee of $1,000 or more by the Commission shall be placed on a Commission meeting agenda before issuance of the fee;

(ii) Waiver guidelines. The Commission shall establish waiver guidelines in accordance with state law, which the Commission, as the filing officer, shall follow in determining whether or not to grant a waiver. These guidelines shall be published on the Commission's website. The Commission shall prescribe criteria for appeal to the Commission of waiver decisions made by the Executive Director. At each regular Commission meeting, the Executive Director shall provide a written report, which shall be published online, regarding any waiver decisions made since the previous regular meeting;

(iii) Referral of final, uncollected fees to collections. Unpaid non-investigatory, per diem late filing fees for disclosure programs that are past due for more than 90 days shall be referred to a City delinquent revenue collection office.

(6) Private right of action. Oakland residents shall have a private right of action to file suits to enforce the Oakland Campaign Reform Act, Oakland Lobbyist Registration Act, Oakland Sunshine Ordinance, and any City governmental ethics ordinance when the City does not impose or stipulate to a penalty or file suit for a particular violation. Such private right of action shall be enabled for a given ordinance once criteria for such suits, including but not limited to a required notice period, actionable violations and remedies that may be sought, are prescribed by the ordinance.

(g) Staff Assistance & Budget.

(1) The City shall appropriate a sufficient budget for the Public Ethics Commission to fulfill the functions and duties as set forth above.

(2) Sufficient staffing shall not be less than the following minimum staffing requirement. Effective July 1, 2015, the City shall meet a minimum staffing requirement for the Commission. The minimum staffing shall consist of the following full-time positions or their equivalent should classifications change: Executive Director; One Deputy Director; One Ethics Investigator; One Program Analyst I or Operations Support Specialist; One Program Analyst; One Administrative Assistant I. The minimum staffing budget set-aside may be suspended, for a fiscal year or a two-year budget cycle, upon a finding in the budget resolution that the City is facing an extreme fiscal necessity, as defined by City Council resolution.

(3) The Executive Director shall serve at the pleasure of the Commission. By an affirmative vote of at least four members, the Commission may terminate the Executive Director. Upon a vacancy, the Commission shall conduct a search for the Executive Director with staff assistance provided by the City Administrator. Upon completion of the search and its vetting of applicants, the Commission shall select two or three finalists and forward the selections to the City Administrator, who shall select one as the Executive Director. The City Administrator shall not have the authority to remove the Executive Director. The Commission shall periodically conduct a performance review of the Executive Director.

(4) The Deputy Director shall serve at the pleasure of the Executive Director. Other than the Executive Director and Deputy Director, staff shall be civil service in accordance with Article IX of the City Charter. After the effective date of this Charter provision, the Commission Executive Director shall identify special qualifications and experience that the Program Analysts and Operation Support Specialist candidates must have. Candidates for future vacancies shall be selectively certified in accordance with the Civil Service Personnel Manual, as may be amended from time to time, except that said selective certification shall not be subject to discretionary approval by the Personnel Director.

(5) All staff are subject to the restrictions in Charter Section 603(e), except that staff are not prohibited from employment with the City and the one-year post-service restriction shall apply only to the Executive Director.

(h) Amendment of Laws. Prior to enacting any amendments to laws that the Commission has the power to enforce, the City Council shall make a finding that the proposed changes further the goals and purposes of the ordinance or program in question and provide specifics substantiating the finding. Absent an urgency finding akin to suspending compliance with the Sunshine Ordinance, amendments to laws that the Commission has the power to enforce and that are proposed by one or more members of the City Council shall be submitted to the Commission for review and comment, prior to passage of the amendments by the City Council.

(i) References to Other Laws in this Section. All references to other laws in this Section shall refer to these laws as they may be amended from time to time.

and be it


Alameda Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: July 23, 2015 14:55 PDT
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://cavotes.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.